hmmm its 1 tsp per 50 gallons of water. How that works out to an amount for a gallon would take math and I am not going there ;-) I call my local pharmacist to do that sort of math. Believe it or not they are very happy to help.
Donna
>________________________________
> From: Cari <cahyman@yahoo.com>
>To: "tropicalfishclub@yahoogroups.com" <tropicalfishclub@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 5:58 PM
>Subject: Re: [tropical fish club] OK, Talked to Dr. Tim again....
>
>
>
>Donna, I've been putting Prime 0.1cc per gallon. Is that right?
>
>I'm making the kids dinner, but I'm curious to try the tap water experiment.
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Oct 28, 2012, at 5:50 PM, Donna King <donnalynneking@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Yes from what he said if you were to test the tap and then add say a double or triple dose of Prime you should read ammonia. Brilliant idea!!
>
>Donna
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Cari <cahyman@yahoo.com>
>>To: "tropicalfishclub@yahoogroups.com" <tropicalfishclub@yahoogroups.com>
>>Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:32 PM
>>Subject: Re: [tropical fish club] OK, Talked to Dr. Tim again....
>>
>>
>>
>>Would this work - take some tap water, test it for ammonia. Put in prime and test again. Will it show false positive ammonia?
>>
>>Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>On Oct 28, 2012, at 4:25 PM, sevenspringss@wmconnect.com wrote:
>>
>>Connie,
>>
>>Of course, Dr. Tim is a much better expert than both of us, but I'd just
>>like to mention that a zero or near-zero nitrite reading would really not
>>necessarily indicate that the tank is cycled. It would just mean that the
>>nitrtite-eating bacteria have populated enough to take care of all the ammonia
>>that's being eaten and converted into nitrite. This may be a relatively small
>>population of nitrite-eating bacteria, especially if relatively little
>>ammonia is being converted into nitrite -- as might "appear" to the the case
>>here (if your high ammonia readings are actually true).
>>
>>Ray</HTML>
>>
>>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (27) |
No comments:
Post a Comment