Donna, I've been putting Prime 0.1cc per gallon. Is that right?
I'm making the kids dinner, but I'm curious to try the tap water experiment.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 28, 2012, at 5:50 PM, Donna King <donnalynneking@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yes from what he said if you were to test the tap and then add say a double or triple dose of Prime you should read ammonia. Brilliant idea!!
Donna
>________________________________
> From: Cari <cahyman@yahoo.com>
>To: "tropicalfishclub@yahoogroups.com" <tropicalfishclub@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:32 PM
>Subject: Re: [tropical fish club] OK, Talked to Dr. Tim again....
>
>
>
>Would this work - take some tap water, test it for ammonia. Put in prime and test again. Will it show false positive ammonia?
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Oct 28, 2012, at 4:25 PM, sevenspringss@wmconnect.com wrote:
>
>Connie,
>
>Of course, Dr. Tim is a much better expert than both of us, but I'd just
>like to mention that a zero or near-zero nitrite reading would really not
>necessarily indicate that the tank is cycled. It would just mean that the
>nitrtite-eating bacteria have populated enough to take care of all the ammonia
>that's being eaten and converted into nitrite. This may be a relatively small
>population of nitrite-eating bacteria, especially if relatively little
>ammonia is being converted into nitrite -- as might "appear" to the the case
>here (if your high ammonia readings are actually true).
>
>Ray</HTML>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (24) |
No comments:
Post a Comment